An intuitive and useful tool for reviewing sessions, abstracts, manuscripts, videos, ePosters, or awards!
Manage your Reviews Effectively with cOASIS
Managing reviews and making sure they’re correctly assigned is not an easy task, but cOASIS’ Review Management Software offers a complete and reliable solution! Reviewers are automatically assigned in groups according to their discipline, role, and the relevant session.
After that, reviews for any type of submission (sessions, presentations, abstracts, ePosters, etc.) can be easily assigned. Customized text for instruction and score criteria can be added to guide the reviewers. Learn more about what our Review Management Software can do for you.
The Reviewer Portal
Reviewers only need to access their Portal to see all their assigned reviews. From here, the reviewers can check deadlines, accept or reject a submission, select standard prepopulated comments, check flags, or enter free-form comments – or any combination of these tasks, depending on how your module is configured.
The Reviewer Portal is very intuitive and user-friendly; reviewers just need to click on each session proposal or abstract to read the full text, charts, tables, and metadata. On the upper part of the screen, the status of completed scores is displayed, providing a quick overview of completed tasks.
Another benefit from using cOASIS is the review process’s flexibility:
Reviewers can complete the reviews online from a PC, tablet, or smartphone.
If the reviewer would rather print abstracts to review offline, they can fill out a “Quick Score” form to accept/reject the abstract and add comments once they’re online again.
Assigned abstracts can also be exported to spreadsheets to review offline, and reviewers can upload them back to the review system with the new decisions and comments.
Reviewers can classify the content from speakers as compliant or not compliant and add comments with the CME Presentation Review tool. We have designed a color-coded workflow to make this process more user-friendly.
Useful Tools for a Smooth Review Process
Histogram Scoring Monitor
Reviewers are provided with a histogram showing a distribution of their scores to make sure the reviewer is scoring equitably. These scores can be filtered and changed by using the “Edit/View Scores” or “Quick Score” links.
Bulk and Offline Reviews
When reviewers have numerous assigned submissions, they have multiple sort options to first read submissions and then review their scores.
Reviewers can read the submissions online, then use the “Quick Score” to enter their scores and comments.
Reviewers can check a box in case they have a conflict. Reports can then track the conflicts and resolutions.
Here, reviewers can view the available abstract and accept or decline to score them. Furthermore, if they have a conflict of interest or believe an abstract is not relevant to the topics assigned to them, reviewers can place said abstract in the Exchange Bin. The submission will be then transferred to another reviewer.
Re-Categorization of Abstracts
Reviewers can easily reassign abstracts to different sections by topic with a single click.
Presentations can be uploaded after their abstracts have been accepted, and reviewers can access the review site again to provide comments.
Reviewers can choose several different parameters to search through their assigned abstracts.
How can we help you achieve your goals?
Tell us more about your events and needs.
Reach out to us in the nearest office.
500 North Michigan Avenue,
Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Nußdorfer Strasse 20/22
1090 Vienna, Austria